Template talk:US patent

src: upload.wikimedia.org

Video Template talk:US patent

Detail dan diskusi teknis

I just found this:

How can I link to a specific patent?

Custom short URL format: http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=1,234,567

where the patent number "1,234,567" can be replaced with a valid patent number in the database, has been set to allow users to more easily build URLs for bookmarks or link to full text of a given patent. To simplify this process further, the patent grant search process has been modified in such a way that when a search result is in one click, the user is directed directly to the full text view for the patent, rather than to a hit list containing only a single patent.

- Omegatron 16:40, 30 Juli 2005 (UTC)

Maps Template talk:US patent

UK Patent Office lebih baik

Unfortunately, this framework only links to the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Many older patents do not have an online text abstract, just a document scan. The USPTO only offers patent images in TIFF format, and then only through browser plug-ins. Although there are a number of plug-ins that can be found on the Web, so far I have not found anything free. Additionally, after repeated requests over the last 3-4 years, the USPTO remains stubborn, refusing to provide a simple text hyperlink to a TIFF file so someone can download it to someone's hard drive and view it with an external, multi-graphic file viewer application.
A better alternative is through the UK Patent Office website. One can find a US patent there in Adobe Acrobat format (PDF), for which the browser plugin is free and available. In addition, the UK site has links to numerous patent collections of countries around the world. --Quicksilver ^{T @} 22:30, November 21, 2005 (UTC)

Free AlternaTIFF like Adobe Reader and it works well for me on the US patent site in Firefox. - Omegatron 01:09, January 6, 2006 (UTC)

And their site provides some links to other resources:

Some people have written a special utility for the USPTO site; see PatentMailer or pat2pdf or innoVUE/interneTIFF. There are also services like US Patent Search and GetThePatent. (Please note that we have no affiliation with any of the products or services listed here - this is not support.) - [1]

Is there anything we can provide links to any of the PDF services? -70.111.223.241 20:23, October 22, 2006 (UTC)

Example

• US. Patent 1,234,567 - Long enough
• US. Patent 1,234,567
• US. Patent 1,234,567 - does not display an image in IE unless there is a character showing
• US. Patent 1,234,567 Ã, - using & amp; nbsp;
• US. Patent 1,234,567 - Using {{ClickA}}, breaking the line.
• US. Patent 1,234,567 - Use CSS negative margins to hide the letter M which is 1em.
• US. Patent 1,234,567 t - uses a negative margin, the image floats above the link in IE.
• US. Patent 1,234,567 Ã, - Does not work in IE for some strange reason.

src: www.oregonbusiness.com

Google Patent Search

Google Patent Search has just been released, and presents the patent as a PNG image rather than TIFF, which makes it easier for those who do not install the browser plugin to view it.

I'm thinking of changing the template to point to Google. However, I do not see an easy way to link to a summary page when a patent number has a comma in it. For example. this works, but it is not. But the current USPTO link allows commas in it, so there's a good chance because some of the usefulness of this template has a comma in it. You can search for {patent 1,234,567}, but do not link to such a summary view. --Interiot 05:37, December 14, 2006 (UTC)

I'm thinking of linking to Google Patent Search, too, but their image has a lower resolution, which is a problem if there is no text attached to it. - Omegatron 17:04, December 20, 2006 (UTC)

Can you first open a page that allows you to choose between three source databases. We already have it for GPS data. You go to the page and choose between Google, Microsoft or Yahoo maps. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958-) 19:13, December 20, 2006 (UTC)

More like Wikipedia: The source of the book... It should not be hard to apply to an existing one. - Omegatron 06:55, December 22, 2006 (UTC)

Sounds like a good idea, because there are various sites to view patents (output to tiff, pdf, png low-res, etc), nothing is clear yet optimal. --Interiot 02:07, December 27, 2006 (UTC)

I really want to see a way to link to Google's patent service. They have done a better job of OCRing the database from the USPTO and you are not forced to use the TIFF viewer for a patent before 1979. Advanced Stage 14:35, June 13, 2007 (UTC)

The problem is that we should link to the USPTO primarily in print because it is more of an authoritative source than a Google Patent search. I've converted most links to work with Google services, I'll set them up on Wikipedia: The template test case now. --Dispenser 22:38, June 20, 2007 (UTC)

I have set up a script on a tool that will redirect a patent by zero or a comma to the right target in Google's patent. However, during the test I found one patent [2] that is not in the Google database. Anyone brave brave? --Dispenser 04:51, August 6, 2007 (UTC)

Archived as Bugzilla: 10866. - Omegatron 23:21, August 9, 2007 (UTC)

src: www.litera.com

Protected Requests

Downgrade protection . Less than 1,000 transclusions, full protection is not required. --Dispenser 03:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

I've been downgraded to the semi-finals. --Ligulem 10:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

src: coda.newjobs.com

pat2pdf.org links

Why does this template generate links pat2pdf.org? That's some random sites that suck revenue with google ads to host public domain material. There are 4000 links on wikipedia probably most of this template. I think we just have to connect to the US government site. If we really want to link to pdf too, and the government site does not have it (I think it exists), then we have to create it directly on the wikimedia server. 64.160.39.153 04:54, April 8, 2007 (UTC)

Templates already linked to USPTO sites, but they have a fee for PDF conversion [3]. The pat2pdf website works quite well for us now. Perhaps in the future someone can write a script to allow us to list all of the different US patent websites similar to Wikipedia: WikiProject Geographical coordinates. --Dispenser 07:12, April 8, 2007 (UTC)

src: www.elizabethpottsweinstein.com

Whitespace spaces

{{US Pat. | 3156523}} does not link correctly (generates U.S. Patent 3,156,523 ), but {{US Patent | 3156523}} (generates U.S. Patent 3,156,523 ). Is there a way to change the template code to avoid this problem? - Unsigned comments added by Itub (talk)

Finish Plasticspork (talk) 01:18, July 23, 2009 (UTC)

src: upload.wikimedia.org

Content providers

Why is Google Patent being used here and not an official USPTO site? --84.44.177.125 (talk) 19:37, June 19, 2009 (UTC)

Most people do not have the plug-ins needed to see the TIFF flavor that USPTO.gov uses for images in patents. Google, on the other hand, transcodes images into formats that appear in every modern browser, such as Google Books. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 01:10, June 20, 2009 (UTC)

Google "fetches" a patent from the USPTO. This allows you to download in PDF format or on-screen display without any special plug-ins such as "Alternative". Google is your friend. --Nukes4Tots (talk) 02:30, June 20, 2009 (UTC)

Might write to the USPTO and say about it ("wrong" file type, etc.) will be useful. Would anyone do it? Ã, :) --87.78.23.227 (talk) 23:35, June 20, 2009 (UTC)

the patent is not in the google database

maybe google interface is better, but does not have all patents. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=7,414,108 vs. http://www.google.com/patents?vid=7414108 Ã, --Chris Capoccia ^T / _C 10:00, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

What about the optional 'source' flag, which would be the default for google? Or is this already there? Plastikspork (talk) 14:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

that's great. --Chris Capoccia ^T / _C 16:29, June 30, 2009 (UTC)

Finish Plasticspork (talk) 01:17, July 23, 2009 (UTC)

The first source should always be the USPTO, it is the official site, authority and get updates first. When you think their page is old school or lost something, write to them and ask for change... Google is _not_ the USPTO! --84.44.179.105 (talk) 19:04, August 11, 2009 (UTC)

I've also recently discovered that Google's patents do not cover all USPTO patents. Could the template be upgraded to provide both links, the first being the USPTO, the second being Google? This will help avoid frustrating editors who receive Google's "not found" message when the patent is present. 84user (talk) 13:24, September 20, 2009 (UTC)

1 "official links" and "enhanced markup links" would be a better solution! --84.44.153.128 (talk) 16:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

If someone can imitate how it looks, I'll be happy to help facilitate the change. Thank you! Plastikspork _{- OE} 20:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Problems with Google Patents? vid =

Google Patent Link AS. Patent 6,812,392 in the Marlon Brando page does not work. There is still a patent on Google. - [box] (speak) 22:14, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

It looks like it has been fixed. - [box] (talk) 22:38, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Google Patent Link Brings False Results

Recently (probably March 8, 2010 to June 8, 2010) this template generates links that in Google raise a list of patents reference of the identified patent. It happens when the "vid =" part of the url is changed to "q =", probably because "vid =" does not work for a while. "vid =" works now, so I change it back. If "vid =" stops working, a better substitute is "q = patent% 3A" which will at least generate a list of search results with a single result that is an identifiable patent.

Jgro (talk) 09:27, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Interwiki pt

Please enter interwiki "pt: PredefiniÃÆ'§ÃÆ' £ o: Patente EUA". --Kaktus Kid (talk) 23:36, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

Design patents

This template can be used to link to US design patents, which I agree is a good thing. However, calling them "patents" is confusing, misleading and, in my opinion, just wrong! As an example of why that is a problem, you do not have to go too far on slashdot to find people who are in an uproar over a clear patent which is actually just a design for a new interface whose interface does not clear its associated functions.

So, the question: is there an easy way to make the difference between a patent and a design patent. for example the "design" parameter that leads to the form link "US Design Patent D123456" rather than just "US Patent D123456"?

Thank you! GDallimore (Speech) 23:27, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

Maybe a template can search for 'D' in the patent number and then enter 'design' if appropriate? Similar to 'RE' for a re-issued patent. Ã, StephoÃ, Ã, talkÃ, 23:59, July 11, 2013 (UTC)

U dot S dot Ay? U <

Why templates force "U.S." without the "AS" option? The dots should be optional. Maybe there should be a parameter to delete it. It might be better to have parameters to add it because the template name does not include the dots. Maybe there should be a twin template, {{AS. patent}} , for a bleak version. Jimp 21:32, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

Proposals for decapitalizing common nouns ("patents")

When this template is used in the article, this will be the text "US Pat." However, the word "patent" is a common noun, not a proper noun, and therefore should not be capitalized. I want to change the source of the template so as to make it a "US patent". Any objections before I do this? Nyq (talk) 13:06, August 13, 2017 (UTC)

Source of the article : Wikipedia